Olis Replies To Government’s §2255 Answer

Attorneys for convicted former Dynegy executive Jamie Olis on Friday filed a Response to the government’s answer to his §2255 Motion To Vacate. From the Introduction:

The government’s Answer starts with the cynical assertion that Olis should suffer a procedural default because the United States Attorney’s Office (“USAO”) successfully deceived Olis and his attorneys by concealing its interference with Olis’s lawful access to defense funding. From there, the Answer devolves downward. Contrary to the government’s contentions, the record establishes that (1) the USAO violated Olis’ fundamental rights by interfering with his access to defense funding; (2) the government constructively and impermissibly amended the indictment; (3) the government presented false testimony from Jeffrey Heil, a key government witness; (4) the petit jury included an admittedly biased and unrehabilitated juror; (5) the jury instructions erroneously defined the elements of wire fraud and mail fraud; and (6) Olis received ineffective assistance of counsel.

The response also asks for reconsideration of his motion for discovery in connection with the §2255 motion; US District Judge Sim Lake denied the motion for discovery in March. Also pending is last week’s request by Olis’ attorney Lloyd Kelley that Lake recuse himself.