There has been no news of late in the ongoing federal bribery investigation of Judge Bobby DeLaughter, former Hinds County DA Ed Peters and Dickie Scruggs in connection with the Wilson v. Scruggs state asbestos fees case, but there is an April 22 filing in the fees case which is of interest. Wilson’s motion for sanctions filed by his attorney Vicki Slater lays out the allegations of bribery in much greater detail than previously revealed in Joey Langston’s guilty plea in January. Of particular interest is a description of how information was allegedly passed between Scruggs’ associates and DeLaughter via Peters and how the rulings were previewed and worked out in advance. The motion asks that all Scruggs’ pleadings after January 2006 be stricken from the case and that all DeLaughter’s rulings after January 2006 favoring Scruggs be declared null and void.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

No comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://letterofapology.com/2008/05/06/wilson-v-scruggs-revisited/trackback/