Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal For Prosecutorial Misconduct in US v. Chapman

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has upheld the dismissal of a 64-count indictment against Daniel Chapman and Sean Flanagan, two attorneys charged in 2003 in what was described as a complex securities trading scheme, because the prosecution withheld 650 pages of potentially exculpatory evidence, lied about it, and turned it over only after the indictment had been dismissed. US District Judge James Mahan dismissed all the charges in 2006 and ruled that a retrial would prejudice the defendants. The appellate court also refused to order a retrial. In the decision, Judge Kim Wardlaw called the Nevada USAO’s actions “prosecutorial misconduct in its highest form; conduct in flagrant disregard of the United States Constitution; and conduct which should be deterred by the strongest sanction available” (National Law Journal).