We recently noted Zach Scruggs’ ludicrous attempt to redefine his disbarment. On Thursday, the Mississippi Supreme Court rejected his motion:
EN BANC
2008-BD-00486-SCTThe Mississippi Bar v. David Zachary Scruggs; Disposition: Motion for rehearing filed by David Zachary Scruggs is denied. Easley, Graves and Randolph, JJ., would grant.
Is this the end of the matter? Or will Zach file a new motion disputing the meaning of “denied”?
(h/t folo)
You must be logged in to post a comment.

No comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://letterofapology.com/2008/10/03/zach-scruggs-permanent-disbarment-yes-its-permanent/trackback/