Former Enron Task Force co-lead prosecutor John Hueston says that the SEC’s insider trading case against Mark Cuban is flimsy, that Cuban isn’t an insider, and that he wouldn’t have brought the case:
….the case really appears to be just a he-said-she-said case. And so, I believe Mr. Cuban has a very strong factual defense before he even gets to any legal arguments. For an insider trading case, he’s not an insider at all. He is essentially a stockholder, essentially pitched to make an additional investment. He was disgusted by that pitch and the direction of the company and sold his stock. And he did so in a very open way consistent with someone who had nothing to hide.
And the SEC in a target-driven matter has now drummed up a case, based on pressured and apparently uncorroborated testimony of one other person on a phone line. That is certainly not a criminal case. And it makes for a risky and flimsy case even under a civil standard. It makes me wonder why the SEC has decided to file this case. And I would not be surprised at all if Mr. Cuban took the SEC to trial over this case.
Hueston is now a partner with Irell & Manella (Corporate Crime Reporter).
You must be logged in to post a comment.

No comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://letterofapology.com/2008/11/24/former-enron-prosecutor-blasts-sec-case-against-mark-cuban/trackback/