<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Letter of Apology &#187; Legal Ethics Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://letterofapology.com/category/legal-ethics-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://letterofapology.com</link>
	<description>a white-collar blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Right To Counsel Decisions May Cause Confusion</title>
		<link>http://letterofapology.com/2009/05/30/right-to-counsel-decisions-may-cause-confusion/</link>
		<comments>http://letterofapology.com/2009/05/30/right-to-counsel-decisions-may-cause-confusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 03:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Solomon Wisenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Ethics Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://letterofapology.com/?p=1195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Greenfield over at Simple Justice has another excellent post here concerning the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent overruling of Michigan v. Jackson. Will prosecutors still be barrred from interviewing, or directing cops/agents to interview, represented suspects under state ethics rules? Under most such rules you cannot speak to a represented person unless his lawyer gives you permission [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Greenfield over at Simple Justice has another excellent post <a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/05/30/ninos-things-that-rarely-happen.aspx?ref=rss">here</a> concerning the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent overruling of Michigan v. Jackson. Will prosecutors still be barrred from interviewing, or directing cops/agents to interview, represented suspects under state ethics rules? Under most such rules you cannot speak to a represented person unless his lawyer gives you permission or unless &#8220;authorized by law.&#8221; I believe that most, but not all, jurisdictions construe &#8220;authorized by law&#8221; to include constitutional law decisions by the Supreme Court, but I haven&#8217;t researched it recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://letterofapology.com/2009/05/30/right-to-counsel-decisions-may-cause-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

