Here is a great letter from conservative legal genius Miguel Estrada supporting Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court, even though their constitutional views differ markedly. Hat tip to How Appealing and The Volokh Conspiracy for posting about it. Estrada’s letter refers to Justice Alito’s confirmation hearings as ranging “from the anodyne and uninformative to the utterly disgraceful.” Spoken like someone who has experienced the process. Estrada himself was put through the meat-grinder when President George W. Bush nominated him to the D.C. Circuit. The White House inadequately prepared Estrada for the proceedings and then refused to mount a fight for him when the going got tough. Estrada points out that elections have consequences and the President gets to nominate judges who share his governing philosophy. True enough, but Senators have the absolute right and power to reject a judicial nominee if they disagree with her legal philosophy. I would just like to be spared the charade of another meaningless confirmation hearing. And I guess I will be spared. HGTV is highly unlikely to interrupt its programming in order to televise the proceedings.
Supreme Court
You are currently browsing the archive for the Supreme Court category.
Estrada Supports Kagan
May 15, 2010 in Supreme Court by Solomon Wisenberg | No comments
Legal Blogs
Other Blogs Of Interest
White Collar Crime Library
- Federal Criminal Appeals: 10 Things You Should Know
- Federal Grand Jury
- Federal Grand Jury: Ten Tips For The Unwary
- How To Avoid Going To Jail Under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 For Lying To Government Agents
- Queen For A Day: The Dangerous Game Of Proffers, Proffer Agreements, And Proffer Letters
- Taking The Fifth Amendment In Front Of The Federal Grand Jury In Order To Protect White Collar Defendants And Their Papers
- White Collar Crime
White Collar Sources
- Federal Criminal Jury Instructions
- Pattern Eighth Circuit Criminal Jury Instructions 2008
- Pattern Eleventh Circuit Criminal Jury Instructions 2003
- Pattern Fifth Circuit Criminal Jury Instructions 2001
- Pattern First Circuit Criminal Jury Instructions 1998
- Pattern First Circuit Criminal Jury Instructions: 2008 Revision
- Pattern Ninth Circuit Criminal Jury Instructions 2003
- Pattern Seventh Circuit Criminal Jury Instructions
- Pattern Sixth Circuit Criminal Jury Instructions 2005
- Pattern Tenth Circuit Criminal Jury Instructions 2005
- Second Circuit Criminal Jury Instructions: U.S. v. Ebbers (SDNY) (Securities Fraud)
Categories
- Accounting Fraud
- American Beat
- Astor Trial
- Bank Fraud
- Brady Issues
- Broadcom
- Charitable Fraud
- Chutzpah
- Classified Leaks
- Constitutional Issues
- Dickie Scruggs
- Dismissed!
- DOJ Issues
- DOJ Scandal
- Dreier
- Earmarks
- Embezzlement
- Enron
- Entertainment Fraud
- Espionage
- FCPA
- Goldman Sachs
- Government Overreaching
- Grand Jury
- Health Fraud
- Honest Services Fraud
- Insider Trading
- Insurance Fraud or Disputes
- Internet Fraud
- Judicial Arrogance
- Judicial Politics
- Legal Ethics Issues
- Madoff
- Mail Fraud
- Mens Rea
- Mortgage Fraud
- Mother Justice
- National Security
- Obits
- Obstruction
- Other Fraud
- Overcriminalization
- Pardon & Clemency
- Perjury
- Petters
- Political Crimes
- Ponzi Schemes
- Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity
- Prosecutorial Abuse
- Prosecutorial Misconduct
- Public Corruption
- Racketeering
- Rattner
- Regulatory Issues
- Securities Fraud
- Sentencing
- Stanford
- Supreme Court
- Tax Fraud
- The Right Stuff
- Uncategorized
- White Collar World
- Wire Fraud
- Witness Tampering
Archives
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
